A STUDY ON THE ACADEMIC STAFF OF LORESTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES POINT OF VIEW ABOUT THE METHODS, PROCESSES AND QUALITY CRITERIA OF TEACHING PERFORMANCE IN 2013

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZENDEDEL A.; ANBARI KH.; ABDOLLAHI Z.; GHOLAMI M.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Medical Education Development Year:2014 | Volume:7 | Issue:15 Page(s): 63-73

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

639

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A STUDY ON THE ACADEMIC STAFF OF LORESTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES POINT OF VIEW ABOUT THE METHODS, PROCESSES AND QUALITY CRITERIA OF TEACHING PERFORMANCE IN 2013

Author(s)

ZENDEDEL A. | ANBARI KH. | ABDOLLAHI Z. | GHOLAMI M.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TEACHERSQ2

TEACHING QUALITY CRITERIAQ2

PROCESSQ3

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONQ3

Abstract

Background and Objective: Assessing teaching and learning can improve the quality of education and educational evaluation. It can be used to determine achievement of the faculty. This study examines the views of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences faculty about the practices, PROCESSes and quality of teaching performance in 2013.Materials and methods: This study is a descriptive cross-sectional study. A questionnaire based on Likert 5 point scale was used. It consisted of three parts of the evaluation PROCESS (9 items), different methods of teacher evaluation (11 items) and evaluation criteria (24 items). All faculty members of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences studied 108 patients using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed by SPSS 17 software.Results: 72.9% of TEACHERS agreed with the assessment of teaching quality. 19.6% of TEACHERS were satisfied with the current trends of teaching evaluation. 35.5% of TEACHERS considered its impact on their teaching PROCESS inadequate. 43.3% of TEACHERS considered it moderate. 41.9% deemed it necessary. The highest and lowest scores in teacher evaluation criteria were related to encouraging students to study and research and introduce them texts and educational pamphlets.Conclusion: The majority of TEACHERS were agreed with teaching evaluation forms and stated that the quality of teaching evaluation forms is to some extent acceptable. It is suggested that educational authorities at various levels of training to draw a more detailed plan to improve education quality.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZENDEDEL, A., ANBARI, KH., ABDOLLAHI, Z., & GHOLAMI, M.R.. (2014). A STUDY ON THE ACADEMIC STAFF OF LORESTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES POINT OF VIEW ABOUT THE METHODS, PROCESSES AND QUALITY CRITERIA OF TEACHING PERFORMANCE IN 2013. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT, 7(15), 63-73. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/219255/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZENDEDEL A., ANBARI KH., ABDOLLAHI Z., GHOLAMI M.R.. A STUDY ON THE ACADEMIC STAFF OF LORESTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES POINT OF VIEW ABOUT THE METHODS, PROCESSES AND QUALITY CRITERIA OF TEACHING PERFORMANCE IN 2013. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT[Internet]. 2014;7(15):63-73. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/219255/en

IEEE: Copy

A. ZENDEDEL, KH. ANBARI, Z. ABDOLLAHI, and M.R. GHOLAMI, “A STUDY ON THE ACADEMIC STAFF OF LORESTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES POINT OF VIEW ABOUT THE METHODS, PROCESSES AND QUALITY CRITERIA OF TEACHING PERFORMANCE IN 2013,” JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT, vol. 7, no. 15, pp. 63–73, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/219255/en

Related Journal Papers