THE COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF COMMON PAIN MANAGEMENT IN ACUTE RENAL COLIC

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

REZA KHANIHA B.; SAFARINEZHAD M.R.; MARKAZI MOGHADAM N.; VALIMANESH H.A.; ABD ELAHIAN M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research Year:2004 | Volume:2 | Issue:3 (Serial Number 7) Page(s): 381-386

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

6,759

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF COMMON PAIN MANAGEMENT IN ACUTE RENAL COLIC

Author(s)

Keywords

ACUTE RENAL COLICQ2

AMINOPHYLLINEQ3

DICLOFENACQ4

PETHIDINEQ3

PIRALGINQ3

Abstract

Background: Renal colic is a common cause of acute severe pain. Opioids and non-opioids analgesics and NSAIDs and phosphodiesterase enzyme (PDE) inhibitors are four medical categories that recommended for treatment, but the relative efficacy of these drugs is uncertain. Materials and Methods: To examine the benefits and disadvantages of PETHIDINE, PIRALGIN, DICLOFENAC and aminophyllin for the management of pain in ACUTE RENAL COLIC, as a randomized clinical trial study, patients with four suspected renal colic (n=200) were randomised to receive these 4-drugs at emergency ward of -hospitals. Pain relief and side effects was assessed at one hour after the analgesics. Oatas has been analised by statistical soft ware of SPSS-ver.11. . Results: pain relieved in the PETHIDINE group after 30 minute and one hour was %60 (30 patients ) & %94(47 patients ),for PIRALGIN group was %54(27 patients) &%92(46 patients), DICLOFENAC group was %28(14 patients)& %68(34 patients) and for AMINOPHYLLINE was %24(12 patients) &%62 (31 patients).(P< 0/05) The side-effects of 4-groups was included: PETHIDINE: nausea (11 Patients), vomiting (7 Patients), respiratory depression(3 Patients) and headache(2 Patients) ; PIRALGIN (3 Patients); AMINOPHYLLINE: orthostatic hypothension(7Patients), vertigue (9Patients ), headache( 12patients); DICLOFENAC had no side-effect. Conclusion: Tramadol response was as same as PETHIDINE but less side-effects DICLOFENAC is a good choice for mild pain; but aminophyllin had a bad response with very much side-effects..

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

REZA KHANIHA, B., SAFARINEZHAD, M.R., MARKAZI MOGHADAM, N., VALIMANESH, H.A., & ABD ELAHIAN, M.. (2004). THE COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF COMMON PAIN MANAGEMENT IN ACUTE RENAL COLIC. ANNALS OF MILITARY AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2(3 (Serial Number 7)), 381-386. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/368214/en

Vancouver: Copy

REZA KHANIHA B., SAFARINEZHAD M.R., MARKAZI MOGHADAM N., VALIMANESH H.A., ABD ELAHIAN M.. THE COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF COMMON PAIN MANAGEMENT IN ACUTE RENAL COLIC. ANNALS OF MILITARY AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH[Internet]. 2004;2(3 (Serial Number 7)):381-386. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/368214/en

IEEE: Copy

B. REZA KHANIHA, M.R. SAFARINEZHAD, N. MARKAZI MOGHADAM, H.A. VALIMANESH, and M. ABD ELAHIAN, “THE COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF COMMON PAIN MANAGEMENT IN ACUTE RENAL COLIC,” ANNALS OF MILITARY AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, vol. 2, no. 3 (Serial Number 7), pp. 381–386, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/368214/en

Related Journal Papers