HEALTH SERVICES ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IN CANADA, NEW ZEALAND AND USA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAFDARI R.; MEYDANI Z.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Inflammatory Diseases (The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Science) Year:2007 | Volume:11 | Issue:1(42) Page(s): 73-78

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,633

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HEALTH SERVICES ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IN CANADA, NEW ZEALAND AND USA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Author(s)

SAFDARI R. | MEYDANI Z. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MEDICAL RECORDSQ3

HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATIONQ3

REFERENCE STANDARDSQ3

Abstract

Background: Accreditation and evaluation play a critical role in quality management. In this regards health records are among the primary documents used by health care facilities to evaluate compliance with the standards set by accreditation agencies.Objective: To compare the strengths, weaknesses, and the general functionality of IM standards of three well-established accreditation agencies in Canada, USA and New Zealand.Method: This was a comparative-descriptive study in which the IM standards of Canada, USA and New Zealand were collected and investigated through the internet and e-mails during 2003-2004.Findings: The data indicated that the JCAHO has adopted maximum standards related to patient-specific information. The data also described that the CCHSA has regarded the most complete and suitable standards related to educational and staff development standards. Considering other data, the maximum standards related to achieving positive outcomes and making improvement has been adopted by the CCHSA and QHNZ.Conclusion: All together, the findings of this comparative study revealed that while the CCHSA and QHNZ have adopted the same standards with emphasis on information management planning standards and achieving positive outcomes, the strong points of JCAHO’s standards are patient specific information and evidence-based decision making.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SAFDARI, R., & MEYDANI, Z.. (2007). HEALTH SERVICES ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IN CANADA, NEW ZEALAND AND USA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASES (THE JOURNAL OF QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), 11(1(42)), 73-78. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/49130/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAFDARI R., MEYDANI Z.. HEALTH SERVICES ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IN CANADA, NEW ZEALAND AND USA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASES (THE JOURNAL OF QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2007;11(1(42)):73-78. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/49130/en

IEEE: Copy

R. SAFDARI, and Z. MEYDANI, “HEALTH SERVICES ACCREDITATION STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IN CANADA, NEW ZEALAND AND USA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY,” JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASES (THE JOURNAL OF QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), vol. 11, no. 1(42), pp. 73–78, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/49130/en

Related Journal Papers