NURSING STUDENTS' VIEWPOINTS TOWARD ROUTINE INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AKHOUNDZADEH K.; SALEHI SHAYESTEH; YOUSEFI M.H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Medical Education Year:2010 | Volume:10 | Issue:3 (27) Page(s): 269-276

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

994

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NURSING STUDENTS' VIEWPOINTS TOWARD ROUTINE INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS

Author(s)

AKHOUNDZADEH K. | SALEHI SHAYESTEH | YOUSEFI M.H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

STUDENTS' VIEWPOINTSQ2

INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLSQ2

POWERPOINTQ2

OVERHEADQ3

WHITEBOARDQ3

Abstract

Introduction: INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS are among effective factors in learning. Learning about STUDENTS' VIEWPOINTS towards these tools could help teachers in choosing the most appropriate one. This study was performed to investigate and compare students' views towards three routine INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS including POWERPOINT, OVERHEAD, and WHITEBOARD.Methods: In this descriptive study in the year 2007, 68 nursing students in Saveh Nursing School were investigated. The sampling was done by convenient sampling method and data were gathered using a 36 item questionnaire. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were verified using content validity and internal consistency of data, respectively. Data were analyzed by SPSS software using descriptive (mean, standard deviation, and frequency) and inferential (paired t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient) statistics.Results: The mean scores of positive responses (from 0 to 100) regarding POWERPOINT, WHITEBOARD and OVERHEAD were 53.65±28.8, 53.65±27.6, and 21.93±25.5, respectively. 57.9% of students preferred POWERPOINT, 38.6% chose WHITEBOARD as their most favorable tool, and 3.5% had the preference for OVERHEAD. A difference was observed between scores of POWERPOINT and OVERHEAD (t = 7.26, p < 0.005) as well as scores of WHITEBOARD and OVERHEAD (t = 8.16, p < 0.005).Conclusion: Since, there are variations in students' preferences for INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS; it is recommended that teachers use a combination of different instructional instruments in order to be more effective in promoting students’ motivation and satisfaction in the classroom.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AKHOUNDZADEH, K., SALEHI, SHAYESTEH, & YOUSEFI, M.H.. (2010). NURSING STUDENTS' VIEWPOINTS TOWARD ROUTINE INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 10(3 (27)), 269-276. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/58979/en

Vancouver: Copy

AKHOUNDZADEH K., SALEHI SHAYESTEH, YOUSEFI M.H.. NURSING STUDENTS' VIEWPOINTS TOWARD ROUTINE INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2010;10(3 (27)):269-276. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/58979/en

IEEE: Copy

K. AKHOUNDZADEH, SHAYESTEH SALEHI, and M.H. YOUSEFI, “NURSING STUDENTS' VIEWPOINTS TOWARD ROUTINE INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 10, no. 3 (27), pp. 269–276, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/58979/en

Related Journal Papers