CLINICAL ASSESSMENT METHODS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITIES OF TEHRAN–CLINICAL INSTRUCTORS' VIEWPOINT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KOUHPAYEZADEH J.; DARGAHI H.; SOLTANI ARABSHAHI K.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Hormozgan Medical Journal Year:2012 | Volume:16 | Issue:5 Page(s): 395-402

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,285

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT METHODS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITIES OF TEHRAN–CLINICAL INSTRUCTORS' VIEWPOINT

Author(s)

KOUHPAYEZADEH J. | DARGAHI H. | SOLTANI ARABSHAHI K. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CLINICALQ2

UNIVERSITIESQ3

OPINIONQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Assessment and evaluation are crucial steps in educational process that play major role in the process of medical education, by certifying competent physicians who can take care of the public health. The purpose of this study was investigation of CLINICAL medical teachers' OPINION about using CLINICAL assessment tools in their CLINICAL setting.Methods: The survey was a descriptive study that was done in Tehran city UNIVERSITIES. Population under the study consisted of academic CLINICAL experts that work as faculty members. The questionnaire was made by using the suggested criteria by ACGME and other valid scientific resources.83 questionnaires were collected Analysis of data was conducted with SPSS version 17, using descriptive statistics.Results: Results indicated that the majority of the subjects believe that, the dominant method in CLINICAL setting is MCQ method. OSCE and Logbook are the next methods. Furthermore, MSF and Portfolio are not used often. However, in Iran University Medical Sciences, the variation of CLINICAL assessment tools were more than other two UNIVERSITIES.Conclusion: It seems that, measurement competency and performance had been toward simulation and unreal situations. The results show that, only in a limited number of CLINICAL training environments, the performance evaluation and real CLINICAL activity has been emphasized.

Cites

THE EFFICACY OF EXISTING LOGBOOKS IN CLINICAL WARDS FROM MEDICAL STUDENTS' VIEWPOINT IN BIRJAND UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, IRAN, IN FALL 2016

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KOUHPAYEZADEH, J., DARGAHI, H., & SOLTANI ARABSHAHI, K.. (2012). CLINICAL ASSESSMENT METHODS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITIES OF TEHRAN–CLINICAL INSTRUCTORS' VIEWPOINT. HORMOZGAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 16(5), 395-402. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/60484/en

Vancouver: Copy

KOUHPAYEZADEH J., DARGAHI H., SOLTANI ARABSHAHI K.. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT METHODS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITIES OF TEHRAN–CLINICAL INSTRUCTORS' VIEWPOINT. HORMOZGAN MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2012;16(5):395-402. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/60484/en

IEEE: Copy

J. KOUHPAYEZADEH, H. DARGAHI, and K. SOLTANI ARABSHAHI, “CLINICAL ASSESSMENT METHODS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITIES OF TEHRAN–CLINICAL INSTRUCTORS' VIEWPOINT,” HORMOZGAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 395–402, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/60484/en

Related Journal Papers