THREE COMPONENTS OF DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION: FEEDBACK, SELF-ASSESSMENT, AND PEER-ASSESSMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAZAVI ABDOLHAMID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: (JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION) JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES Year:2017 | Volume:9 | Issue:36 Page(s): 49-74

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,277

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THREE COMPONENTS OF DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION: FEEDBACK, SELF-ASSESSMENT, AND PEER-ASSESSMENT

Author(s)

RAZAVI ABDOLHAMID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATIONQ2

FEEDBACKQ1

PEER-ASSESSMENTQ1

SELFASSESSMENTQ1

Abstract

The purpose of this article is responding to the question of “How is the quality of teacher FEEDBACK, studentsʼ self-evaluation and peer evaluation? ” The research method is a combination of "documentary, descriptive and survey”. The sample was selected through a multi-stage stratified sampling, out of which 64 primary schools, located in 30 local educational districts in 3 provinces (East Azerbaijan, Fars and Bushehr) were selected. One checklist to analyze the portfolios and one interview form with acceptable reliability and validity were used. The findings show that teacher’ FEEDBACKs are beyond the student’s performance, the content of the FEEDBACK is not related to the learning goals and objectives, and the descriptions are not appealing enough and do not fit the studentsʼ level of progress. Although the FEEDBACK did not contain anything with regard to providing a chance for the students to compersate for their weaknesses, they were polite to some extent. In self evaluation, students did not have the necessary skills. Weakness in four selfevaluation skills in the lower grades was more evident. Teachers use limited methods for PEER-ASSESSMENT and are less familiar with the concepts and methods of peer-asssessent.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAZAVI, ABDOLHAMID. (2017). THREE COMPONENTS OF DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION: FEEDBACK, SELF-ASSESSMENT, AND PEER-ASSESSMENT. (JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION) JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 9(36 ), 49-74. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/183425/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAZAVI ABDOLHAMID. THREE COMPONENTS OF DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION: FEEDBACK, SELF-ASSESSMENT, AND PEER-ASSESSMENT. (JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION) JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2017;9(36 ):49-74. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/183425/en

IEEE: Copy

ABDOLHAMID RAZAVI, “THREE COMPONENTS OF DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION: FEEDBACK, SELF-ASSESSMENT, AND PEER-ASSESSMENT,” (JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION) JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, vol. 9, no. 36 , pp. 49–74, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/183425/en

Related Journal Papers