THINKING STYLES AND LEARNING APPROACHES IN RELATION TO STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHOKRI O.; KADIVAR P.; FARZAD VALI ELAH; DANESHVARPOUR Z.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Advances in Cognitive Sciences Year:2006 | Volume:8 | Issue:2 Page(s): 44-52

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,295

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THINKING STYLES AND LEARNING APPROACHES IN RELATION TO STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

Author(s)

SHOKRI O. | KADIVAR P. | FARZAD VALI ELAH | DANESHVARPOUR Z. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

THINKING STYLESQ2

LEARNING APPROACHESQ3

GENDERQ3

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTQ2

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine THINKING STYLES and LEARNING APPROACHES in relation to ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT of university students. Method: On a sample of 398 subjects (203 males and 195 females), the THINKING STYLES Inventory and Study Process Questionnaire were applied. Students’ average scores were obtained from the university administrations, and was used as a measure of ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. For testing the relations between THINKING STYLES and LEARNING APPROACHES in GENDERs, and for associations among study variables, we used independent group t-test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and regression analysis. Results: The results showed a significant difference between males and females in legislative, judicial, hierarchical, internal, and external THINKING STYLES and the surface learning approach. A significant positive correlation was noticed between the legislative, judicial, liberal, hierarchical, and external THINKING STYLES and the deep learning approach with ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT had a significant negative correlation between executive, local, and conservative THINKING STYLES and the surface learning approach. Also, the association between the legislative, judicial, liberal, hierarchical, and external THINKING STYLES with the deep learning approach was positive and significant. The executive, local, conservative, and oligarchic THINKING STYLES were strongly associated with the surface learning approach. Five dimensions of THINKING STYLES and two levels of LEARNING APPROACHES contributed to the prediction of students’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. Conclusion: The role of THINKING STYLES and LEARNING APPROACHES should be considered in studies on ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT of university students.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHOKRI, O., KADIVAR, P., FARZAD, VALI ELAH, & DANESHVARPOUR, Z.. (2006). THINKING STYLES AND LEARNING APPROACHES IN RELATION TO STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 8(2), 44-52. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/82860/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHOKRI O., KADIVAR P., FARZAD VALI ELAH, DANESHVARPOUR Z.. THINKING STYLES AND LEARNING APPROACHES IN RELATION TO STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE[Internet]. 2006;8(2):44-52. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/82860/en

IEEE: Copy

O. SHOKRI, P. KADIVAR, VALI ELAH FARZAD, and Z. DANESHVARPOUR, “THINKING STYLES AND LEARNING APPROACHES IN RELATION TO STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT,” ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 44–52, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/82860/en

Related Journal Papers