EFFECTS OF CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT LEARNING IN TRACKING TASK

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHEYRANDISH A.; ABDOLI B.; NAMAZI ZADEH M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: OLYMPIC Year:2009 | Volume:17 | Issue:3 (SERIAL 47) Page(s): 75-86

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,685

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EFFECTS OF CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT LEARNING IN TRACKING TASK

Author(s)

KHEYRANDISH A. | ABDOLI B. | NAMAZI ZADEH M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BLOCKED PRACTICEQ3

CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCEQ3

EXPLICIT LEARNINGQ2

IMPLICIT LEARNINGQ2

RANDOM PRACTICEQ3

TRACKING TASKQ2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE on TRACKING TASK under the conditions of implicit and EXPLICIT LEARNING. The subjects were 36 right-handed male students of physical education (age 18-26) who had been randomly divided into four experimental groups. The subjects, after getting familiar with TRACKING TASK, tried 15 trail during the pre-test and exercised 4 blocks of nine-try each day during 4 consecutive days in the formats of random and BLOCKED PRACTICE. The two EXPLICIT LEARNING groups did just the TRACKING TASKs while the two IMPLICIT LEARNING groups did a secondary task as well. The collected data was analyzed by a one-way variance and the results showed that IMPLICIT LEARNING practice was as effective as EXPLICIT LEARNING practice, the result also confirmed the theory that RANDOM PRACTICE is more effective than BLOCKED PRACTICE. Also, Result showed that although the performance in BLOCKED PRACTICE was not better than that in RANDOM PRACTICE in the learning phase, the RANDOM PRACTICE group performed far better than the BLOCKED PRACTICE group in the retrieval phase.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

KHEYRANDISH, A., ABDOLI, B., & NAMAZI ZADEH, M.. (2009). EFFECTS OF CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT LEARNING IN TRACKING TASK. OLYMPIC, 17(3 (SERIAL 47)), 75-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/37644/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHEYRANDISH A., ABDOLI B., NAMAZI ZADEH M.. EFFECTS OF CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT LEARNING IN TRACKING TASK. OLYMPIC[Internet]. 2009;17(3 (SERIAL 47)):75-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/37644/en

IEEE: Copy

A. KHEYRANDISH, B. ABDOLI, and M. NAMAZI ZADEH, “EFFECTS OF CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE IN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT LEARNING IN TRACKING TASK,” OLYMPIC, vol. 17, no. 3 (SERIAL 47), pp. 75–86, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/37644/en

Related Journal Papers