This study aimed to compare the quality ofcurriculum evaluation from the perspective ofgraduate students in the humanities (the study ofIslamic Azad University of Torbat) is paid. Theresearch method in terms of the purpose of thesurvey is to collect data and descriptive. Thestudy population included all graduate and PhDstudents in the humanities of Islamic AzadUniversity torbat-e heydarieh branch, Thatnumber is 132. Because of the small sizepopulation through census method wasconsidered as sample. To collect information, used of research maker questionnair. The contentvalidity was used to determine validity. Itsreliability by using Cronbach's alpha coefficientwas equal to 79/0. To analyze the data from onesample t test, independent t test and one wayAnova were used. The software spss17 was usedfor data analysis. According to the results of thequality indicators of the content of teachingmethods, materials and teaching aids (senior), learning activities (PhD), field of PersianLanguage and Literature, from the perspective ofthe students is estimated to be unfavorable. Butindexes learning groups (senior), learninggroups, educational space (DR), was estimatedat an optimum level. Also the views of students'English language curriculum goals, learninggroups, evaluating curriculum (top), materialsand teaching aids, teaching methods, materialsand teaching aids (DR), was estimated at anoptimum level. The objectives of the curriculum, combining content, learning groups (PhD), educational environment (senior), was estimatedat unsatisfactory level. According to the studentsof jurisprudence and Islamic law also aimsindicators curriculum, teaching methods, materials and teaching aids, (senior) and the timeneeded (DR), is estimated at an optimum level. But indicators of the content, time needed toevaluate the curriculum (senior) and learningactivities (PhD) was undesirable.